<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Unwired View - Latest Comments in 2 versions Nokia N85 pass through FCC</title><link>http://unwiredview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://unwiredview.disqus.com/2_versions_nokia_n85_pass_through_fcc_91/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:55:05 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 2 versions Nokia N85 pass through FCC</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/08/07/2-versions-nokia-n85-pass-through-fcc/#comment-1121383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, yes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But with WCDMA components removed - what you get is a 2.5G phone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;FCC documents  clearly seem to be  talking about about two different phones&lt;br&gt;here:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The EUT is a 4-band (GSM850/900/1800/1900) mobile phone with GPRS, EGPRS,&lt;br&gt;Bluetooth&lt;br&gt;and FM transmitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The EUT is a 7-band (GSM850/900/1800/1900 and WCDMA Band I/II(1900)/VIII)&lt;br&gt;mobile phone&lt;br&gt;with GPRS, EGPRS, Bluetooth, WLAN and FM transmitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And why would they remove 3G and WLAN components for a test of the same&lt;br&gt;phone?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Staska</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:55:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 2 versions Nokia N85 pass through FCC</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/08/07/2-versions-nokia-n85-pass-through-fcc/#comment-1121219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From FCC test report: “The only difference between RM-335 and RM-333 is that RM-335 has had all WCDMA and WLAN components removed“ and ”The test results of QURRM-333 are re-used for certification of the QURRM-335“.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:20:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>