<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Unwired View - Latest Comments in iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://unwiredview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://unwiredview.disqus.com/iphone_20_iphone_30_or_iphone_nano_a_clamshellflip_phone/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:08:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-30969404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i wanna buy it&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fakhrul</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-23613375</link><description>&lt;p&gt;haha!..how do you know that isn't "gonna" happen...i mean come on you guys don't know what will happen in the future...you guys can't see the future....haha...[at least they are thinking outside of the box]&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thisgirlwhothinksoutsidethebox</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:09:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-20905176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article about the Iphone I like it might happen..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hotmail email</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 23:36:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-15134397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;ohh…nice post but really?/? :P&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iPod touch microphone</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-13101735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;never i think&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anang</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:28:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-12027453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This isn't gonna happen, pretty unrealistic and stupid&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jasa Pembuatan Web/Blog Murah</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:07:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-10701122</link><description>&lt;p&gt;leave it alone ! its already the best...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:05:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-9736304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow a fucking moron posted this rumor. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alaoalepeofjcjrjeieie</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:14:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-8949513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;what a piece&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 04:29:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-8559646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They may do it. &lt;br&gt;If they do, it will be an amazing feat. &lt;br&gt;I'd love to see it done &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Haley</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:40:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-8057352</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Apple will never come out with a flip phone. That is just gay. The iPhone nano is already being made, and will be out around June/July of 09 (this year). Go to &lt;a href="http://xskn.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="xskn.com"&gt;xskn.com&lt;/a&gt;. They already leaked skins on accident.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devin</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:05:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-7690522</link><description>&lt;p&gt;LMFAO this will never ever be produced. In fact i don't think apple wants a flip phone, thats y its a touch screen i dont know why you wasted your time doing this lol no point&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">james</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:44:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-7477883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You guys can also see the download torrent for iPhone 3.0 btw this is very nice review tho...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.livecrunch.com/2009/03/18/iphone-os-30-leaked-torrent-download-link/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.livecrunch.com/2009/03/18/iphone-os-30-leaked-torrent-download-link/"&gt;http://www.livecrunch.com/2...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@JoeHobot</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:37:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-5069501</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, every novelty is stupid. We have already all, iPod touch... All inventors are a** h***s.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Go fish damned mindless troll.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">God</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:29:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-4958037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;lol its really pointless to have that clamshell open just to dial then close it and you get the normal iphone features.... um duhhh! That is why apple built all that bs right into the touch itself... so you do not have to open the darn thing to dial and speak.  &lt;br&gt;But it is posts like these that get people thinking and maybe come up with some other cool ass bs to build.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Peace..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">che'lu</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-4810594</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow this looks horrible and beyond unrealistic, whoever came up with the design to this piece of crap has serious mental issues, when believing that Apple would ever get high enough to incorporate this ugly beast into such a sexy concept as the iphone 3.0, fuck whoever came up with this abomination... Period&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mjhj</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:08:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-4632648</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder programs like &lt;a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=295533061&amp;amp;mt=8" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewSoftware?id=295533061&amp;amp;mt=8"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; will run on these babies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 02:47:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-4511623</link><description>&lt;p&gt;how about nooo&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:24:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-3964100</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Liam,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WTF are you talking about? And can you read at all? I never said that  that&lt;br&gt;first picture in the article is from the Apple patent app.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In fact what I said, and you should have noticed if you read he article, is&lt;br&gt;"The drawings above, *are Photoshop renderings*, *based on a device&lt;br&gt;described in a recent Apple's patent application*, called "*Dual sided&lt;br&gt;trackpad*". I took the pictures from the original patent app (you can see&lt;br&gt;some of the drawings in the article), and then made a PS rendering based on&lt;br&gt;current iPhone design, and clearly stated so. What's so hard to understand&lt;br&gt;about that?!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Try not to appear an idiot yourself. Just try reading the article before&lt;br&gt;commenting on it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And in case you were wondering, there is an Apple patent for such clamshell.&lt;br&gt;Here's a link to it&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/fetch.jsp?LANG=ENG&amp;amp;DBSELECT=PCT&amp;amp;SERVER_TYPE=19-10&amp;amp;SORT=41237072-KEY&amp;amp;TYPE_FIELD=256&amp;amp;IDB=0&amp;amp;IDOC=1412074&amp;amp;C=10&amp;amp;ELEMENT_SET=B&amp;amp;RESULT=233&amp;amp;TOTAL=846&amp;amp;START=226&amp;amp;DISP=25&amp;amp;FORM=SEP-0/HITNUM,B-ENG,DP,MC,AN,PA,ABSUM-ENG&amp;amp;SEARCH_IA=US2007019551&amp;amp;QUERY=(PA%2fapple)+" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/fetch.jsp?LANG=ENG&amp;amp;DBSELECT=PCT&amp;amp;SERVER_TYPE=19-10&amp;amp;SORT=41237072-KEY&amp;amp;TYPE_FIELD=256&amp;amp;IDB=0&amp;amp;IDOC=1412074&amp;amp;C=10&amp;amp;ELEMENT_SET=B&amp;amp;RESULT=233&amp;amp;TOTAL=846&amp;amp;START=226&amp;amp;DISP=25&amp;amp;FORM=SEP-0/HITNUM,B-ENG,DP,MC,AN,PA,ABSUM-ENG&amp;amp;SEARCH_IA=US2007019551&amp;amp;QUERY=(PA%2fapple)+"&gt;http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/e...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Staska</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 22:44:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-3955259</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Bullshit. And that picture is not from the original iPhone patent, because it features software from the January 2008 software update. You, sir, are an idiot. This is stupid. I hate Internet rumors.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liam Sargent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:02:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-3311365</link><description>&lt;p&gt;that is pretty idiotic&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Keegster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-2557301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;bonjour,&lt;br&gt;je souhaiterai avoir un iphone nano par la poste &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bassot</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 04:56:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-2420784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's great thing&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">r.pandurangan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:04:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-2420768</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it's great thinging&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">r.pandurangan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 07:02:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone 2.0, iPhone 3.0 or iPhone Nano &amp;#8211;  a clamshell/flip phone?</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/03/17/iphone-20-iphone-30-or-iphone-nano-a-clamshellflip-phone/#comment-2242422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;its dumb cause u take all the baeuty from the tactil screen it aint gonna happen at least this way &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pedro Pichete</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>