<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Unwired View - Latest Comments in New Palm Nova OS to be unveiled at CES 2009</title><link>http://unwiredview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://unwiredview.disqus.com/new_palm_nova_os_to_be_unveiled_at_ces_2009_40/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:28:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: New Palm Nova OS to be unveiled at CES 2009</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/15/new-palm-nova-os-to-be-unveiled-at-ces-2009/#comment-4409886</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Exactly. Hopefully by now, they've learned their lesson. Though you can't really blame them, since their behavior was typical of successful entities back in their prime time (letting your product or service rot just because the competition seems to be unable to catch up), at least they're doing the right thing now and trying hard to catch up&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David Gonzales</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:28:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New Palm Nova OS to be unveiled at CES 2009</title><link>http://www.unwiredview.com/2008/12/15/new-palm-nova-os-to-be-unveiled-at-ces-2009/#comment-4409205</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The real tragedy here is that Palm had years and years as the sole player in the field, and could easily have developed a real (single threaded is not) operating system in that time.  But they chose to just collect profits instead and are now in a fight for their life vs. Windows Mobile, Asteroid, and whatever the iPhone's OS is called.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Edward Virtually</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:34:26 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>