<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Unwired View - Latest Comments in Skinny phone concept could make for a nice T-Mobile G1 2.0</title><link>http://unwiredview.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://unwiredview.disqus.com/skinny_phone_concept_could_make_for_a_nice_t_mobile_g1_20/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:38:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Skinny phone concept could make for a nice T-Mobile G1 2.0</title><link>https://www.unwiredview.com/2008/11/29/skinny-phone-concept-could-make-for-a-nice-t-mobile-g1-20/#comment-9299037</link><description>&lt;p&gt;is it gonna come out and if so when&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sergio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 18:38:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Skinny phone concept could make for a nice T-Mobile G1 2.0</title><link>https://www.unwiredview.com/2008/11/29/skinny-phone-concept-could-make-for-a-nice-t-mobile-g1-20/#comment-4078711</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Way too simple with no memorable elements. You might not like the G1's design, but at least its easily recognizable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">YpoCaramel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:29:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Skinny phone concept could make for a nice T-Mobile G1 2.0</title><link>https://www.unwiredview.com/2008/11/29/skinny-phone-concept-could-make-for-a-nice-t-mobile-g1-20/#comment-4072890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would hate it.  The keys aren't raised, and many of us who use QWERTY style keyboards do so because we can type without looking.  That would be the same as typing on a storm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 12:51:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>